<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Gnu Make on Living Systems_</title>
    <link>https://livesys.se/tags/gnu-make/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Gnu Make on Living Systems_</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:46:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://livesys.se/tags/gnu-make/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The problem with make for scientific workflows</title>
      <link>https://livesys.se/posts/the-problem-with-make-for-scientific-workflows/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:46:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://livesys.se/posts/the-problem-with-make-for-scientific-workflows/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;selection_131png&#34;&gt;&lt;p class=&#34;image&#34;&gt;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&#34;selection_131.png&#34; alt=&#34;&#34;  /&gt;&#xA;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-workflow-problem-solved-once-and-for-all-in-1979&#34;&gt;The workflow problem solved once and for all in 1979?&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;As soon as the topic of scientific workflows is brought up, there are&#xA;always a few make fans fervently insisting that the problem of workflows&#xA;is solved once and for all with &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.gnu.org/software/make/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;GNU&#xA;make&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;, written first in the 70&amp;rsquo;s :)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Personally I haven&amp;rsquo;t been so sure. On the one hand, I know the tool&#xA;solves a lot of problems for many people. Also, there is something very&#xA;attractive about buildling on a tool that you can be sure will be&#xA;available on more or less every unix-like operating system, for decades&#xA;to come.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
